These draft regulations pave the way for the continuation of the live export of animals by sea — a practice that SLESA believes is unjust, inhumane and economically misleading, says the association.

Established in February 2024, SLESA is a voluntary association of South Africans united in opposition to live animal export by sea. With the support of 50 social justice and animal welfare organisations and a growing base of individual members, SLESA is committed to public education, lobbying and campaigning to end the suffering inflicted on animals through the live export trade, adds the association.

A spokesperson for SLESA says, "These regulations cannot be passed without scrutiny. We need a significant, united public response to ensure a rigorous consultation process — one that includes the South African public and all animal welfare organisations. We only have until Monday, 25 August to submit objections. The time to act is now."

In December 2024, the Department formally responded to a joint request from SLESA and FOUR PAWS South Africa to implement a ban. Dr Anndrea Yelliah, Deputy Director for Primary Animal Health Care says, "It is the Ministry's position that all animal transport and export must be carried out with due regard for animal welfare — the guidelines for the exportation of live animals by sea are currently in the process of being formalised into regulations. This will follow the Department's standard consultation process, during which stakeholders will have the opportunity to provide further comments and inputs."

While government maintains that its regulatory approach prioritises animal welfare, SLESA contests that live export by sea can be considered humane. Global evidence says that these systems result in immense animal suffering — and are near-impossible to monitor once the animals leave South African shores, says the group.

"Once animals are at sea, there is no independent monitoring," adds the spokesperson for SLESA. "Even when regulations exist, they are unenforceable at sea, where conditions are often horrific due to the length of time animals have to travel."

This was evident in February 2024 when the Kuwaiti "Death Ship" carrying 19 000 cattle docked in Cape Town on its voyage from Brazil to the Middle East. NSPCA inspectors documented animals standing in knee-deep faeces and ammonia, with several requiring euthanasia due to the conditions on board, says the association.

SLESA highlights the economic justification for live export. The Department has framed the trade as a socio-economic benefit to the industry and emerging farmers — the reality tells a different story. The vast majority of livestock exported are owned by wealthy commercial farmers, not small-scale or emerging farmers. These animals are trucked long distances across the country — often while unfit to travel — exposing them to injury, additional stress and risk, adds the association.

"Pain for profit is not a just or sustainable model," says the spokesperson for SLESA, "The government's narrative around economic benefits fails to account for the suffering of sentient animals and the long-term damage to South Africa's reputation. We must not follow countries that have pursued this trade at the expense of animal welfare or our own morality as a nation but rather learn from the nations that have banned or are in the process of phasing out the trade. These include Luxembourg (2019), New Zealand (the ban took effect in April 2023), Brazil (the ban was upheld in 2024), Germany (has had export bans to certain non-EU countries since 2022), the United Kingdom (the ban was passed in 2024) and Australia (the ban will be implemented by May 2028). These countries are setting a moral and scientific precedent South Africa can and should follow."

CIWF played a pivotal role in banning live exports in the UK and will continue the fight to ban live exports in South Africa. Alexis Olds, the Head of Southern Africa says, "The export of live animals is an inhumane and unnecessary trade that needs to end. There is no justifiable reason to expose these sentient beings to this type of treatment. We will be opposing the live export regulations, and we urge all South Africans to join our voice against this cruel trade."

SLESA raises concern over the lack of independent oversight. Under the draft regulations, the Department would appoint its own monitors which represents a conflict of interest and dismisses the welfare protections included in the regulations. Many of the countries importing live animals from South Africa — such as Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Mauritius — have lower animal welfare standards than South Africa. Once animals arrive, they are not protected by South African law and are commonly subjected to inhumane handling and slaughter practices, including non-stunned slaughter and unregulated backyard slaughter, says the association.

"This trade sends our animals into the unknown, where cruelty is not the exception but the norm," SLESA adds, "No regulation can safeguard their welfare once they leave our shores. That's why this trade must be outlawed, not regulated."

SLESA and CIWF are urging the public to respond to the Department with logical and informed objections that draw on scientific research — including findings from the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) and veterinary studies; that have shown that live export by sea subjects animals to prolonged stress, injury, overcrowding, motion sickness, extreme temperatures, ammonia exposure and deprivation of food and water. In addition, the mass transport of live animals across international borders increases the risk of zoonotic disease transmission  — a risk flagged by global health authorities. The combination of high-stress conditions, close confinement and extended journeys creates a breeding ground for disease, threatening animal welfare and public health, says the association.

"No matter how strict the rules, the live export trade is an unjust and unnecessary practice. These horrors are not glitches in the system, they are inherent to the process and cannot be eliminated through regulation. We must demand a total ban and now is the time to use our collective voice to speak for those who cannot speak for themselves," concludes SLESA.

For more information, visit www.stopliveexport.co.za. You can also follow SLESA on Facebook, or on Instagram.

*Image courtesy of contributor